So if long videos are truly a problem for Studio, it should be a huge negative. If someone wants to take old video tapes or old 8mm movies and make a compendium, it's entirely reasonable to expect to fill the disc. Folks who invest in a DVD burner will naturally have the expectation that they can create a project that will fit the disk, which means two hours with reasonable quality or an hour at maximum quality. Naturally, if Pinnacle suggested only short projects, the product would not sell as well. Video Length - It is completely bogus to suggest that the program is not suitable for long videos. This sort of bug is very typical of the problems with v8 if these bugs could be quashed, Studio would have no competition. In a three-minute video, a project I created from scratch using v9 (as opposed to importing from v8), a SmartSound-generated music clip that previews perfectly stutters when played from the burned DVD. Has this improved with 9? It's too early to tell, but the signs are not encouraging. It's bugs, especially regarding the burning of discs. Stability - The big issue with Studio v8/v9 is not crashes. Three points about your review of Pinnacle Studio 9.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |